Resources and References

Here is a list of reference articles to substantiate the educational material provided in the BAARD courses

1. Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, Sesma N, Özcan M. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):985-94.
2. Arnetzl GV, Arnetzl G. Biomechanical examination of inlay geometries–is there a basic biomechanical principle? Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(2):119-30.
3. Vianna ALSV, Prado CJD, Bicalho AA, Pereira RADS, Neves FDD, Soares CJ. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20180004.
4. Huang, X, Zou, L, Yao, R, Wu, Li, Y. Effect of preparation design on the fracture behavior of ceramic occlusal veneers in maxillary premolars. Journal of Dentistry 2020; (97) 103346.
5. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–1639.
6. Milicich G. The compression dome concept: the restorative implications. Gen Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5):55-60.
7. Magne P, Belser UC. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: a finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Oct;22(5):425-33.
8. Ford C, Bush MB, Lawn B. Effect of wear on stress distributions and potential fracture in teeth. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Nov;20(11):2243-7.
9. Goel, VK, Khera, SC, Ralston, J, Chang, KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth – A finite element investigation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991; 66 (4) 451-459.
10. Thompson VP. The tooth: An analogue for biomimetic materials design and processing. Dent Mater. 2020 Jan;36(1):25-42.
11. Zaslansky P, Friesem AA, Weiner S. Structure and mechanical properties of the soft zone separating bulk dentin and enamel in crowns of human teeth: insight into tooth function. J Struct Biol. 2006 Feb;153(2):188-99.
12. Wang RZ, Weiner S. Strain-structure relations in human teeth using Moiré J Biomech. 1998 Feb;31(2):135-41.
13. Imbeni V, Kruzic JJ, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Ritchie RO. The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth. Nat Mater. 2005 Mar;4(3):229-32.
14. Bazos P, Magne P. Bio-emulation: biomimetically emulating nature utilizing a histo-anatomic approach; structural analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011 Spring;6(1):8-19. PMID: 21403924.
15. Chai H, Lee JJ, Constantino PJ, Lucas PW, Lawn BR. Remarkable resilience of teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 5;106(18):7289-93.
16. Ma L, Guess PC, Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater. 2013 Jul;29(7):742-51.
17. Yan J, Kaizer MR, Zhang Y. Load-bearing capacity of lithium disilicate and ultra-translucent zirconias. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec;88:170-175.
18. Wang Z, Wang K, Xu W, Gong X, Zhang F. Mapping the mechanical gradient of human dentin-enamel-junction at different intratooth locations. Dent Mater. 2018 Mar;34(3):376-388.
19. Lazari PC, de Carvalho MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 May;119(5):769-776.
20. Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod. 1998 Jan;24(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80208-2.
21. Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16-42.
22. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002 Sep;18(6):470-8.
23. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, Mjör IA. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int Endod J. 2003 Jan;36(1):33-43.
24. Kwang S, Aminoshariae A, Harding J, Montagnese TA, Mickel A. The critical time-lapse between various restoration placements and subsequent endodontic intervention. J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1922-6.
25. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, Mjör IA. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int Endod J. 2003 Jan;36(1):33-43
26. Hofsteenge JW, Hogeveen F, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the aging and fracture strength of lithium disilicate inlays and overlays. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Oct;110:103906.
27. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):e73-81.
28. van den Breemer CRG, Özcan M, Cune MS, van der Giezen R, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Aug;72:102-109.
29. Yazigi C, Kern M, Chaar MS. Influence of various bonding techniques on the fracture strength of thin CAD/CAM-fabricated occlusal glass-ceramic veneers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov;75:504-511.
30. Garry J. P. Fleming & Owen Addison (2009) Adhesive Cementation and the Strengthening of All-Ceramic Dental Restorations, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 23:7-8, 945-959.
31. Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):457-64.
32. Rojpaibool T, Leevailoj C. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses. J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):141-149.
33. Clausen JO, Abou Tara M, Kern M. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Dent Mater. 2010 Jun;26(6):533-8.
34. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Dec;94(6):511-9.
35. Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(1):38-48.
36. Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct;60(4):240-249.
37. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984 Dec;63(12):1396-9.
38. Lührs AK, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Mar;30(3):281-91.
39. Murata T, Maseki T, Nara Y. Effect of immediate dentin sealing applications on bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic onlay restoration. Dent Mater J. 2018 Nov 30;37(6):928-939.
40. Urabe, I, Nakajima, M, Sano, H, Tagami, J. Physical Properties of the Dentin-Enamel Junction Region. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000; 13 (3) 129-135.
41. Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater. 2004 May;20(4):322-9.
42. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Jun;22(3):241-9.
43. Ferraris F, Sammarco E, Romano G, Cincera S, Giulio M. Comparison of posterior indirect adhesive restorations (PIAR) with different preparation designs according to the adhesthetics classification. Part 1: Effects on the fracture resistance. Int J Esthet Dent. 2021 May 10;16(2):144-167.